What's in a name: Underlord FAQ

Is there a story or concept behind the branding of "Underlord"?

Yes, there’s a story. For weeks and maybe months as we developed the features that would provide Underlord’s powers we talked about whether Underlord (not yet named) was an entity or a tool. Was Underlord a copilot? A co-editor? A producer? A magic wand or a bunch of sparkles? A UFO? We wondered whether AI would take over the world, would take our jobs, would steal our data. Whether it would make the creative process more divine or more mundane. A weird amount of this anxiety showed up in tortuous design reviews of icons. In the end we wanted to make a few deliberate choices:

  • AI is not sparkles. Treating this powerful, slightly unsettling new technology like a kid-friendly magic trick puts us on the wrong side of history.
  • While some of Underlord’s powers are better thought of as tools, ultimately what makes the technology behind Underlord more powerful than a wrench is its ability to conceive of and understand more complex directives and subtleties the way we expect entities can.
  • Underlord can help you with your craft, but you and the stuff in your head and your heart (gross!) is what makes your content good (Or bad! Sometimes it’s bad!) and Underlord is ultimately just a little imp-like creature that can help take you in the direction you want your art to go.

If the name doesn’t land for you, we get it. Maybe we’ll change it at some point. But this is where we are now in our relationship with this amazing, but also weird and a little scary, but also kind of annoyingly incompetent, but also, again, pretty cool, technology. Let’s work through it together!

Can you explain the rationale behind using a term like "Underlord," commonly found in fantasy, for a technology product? And how do you address concerns from the fantasy community that the name might trivialize elements of their genre?

The choice of the name "Underlord" for our AI editing assistant was driven by the desire to convey the power and depth of its capabilities in managing complex video editing tasks. The term often found in fantasy contexts represents mastery and control, qualities that we aim to encapsulate within our technology. It symbolizes the assistant’s ability to efficiently handle the 'underlying' or foundational aspects of video production, allowing users to focus more on creative expression.

We understand and respect the concerns from the fantasy community regarding the potential trivialization of elements from their beloved genre. In choosing this name, our intent was not to co-opt or diminish these elements but to draw on the positive attributes associated with such a powerful title—deep knowledge, control, and oversight. We hope to honor the spirit of innovation and imagination that is so prevalent in fantasy literature and media, viewing our use of the term "Underlord" as a homage to these creative worlds rather than a trivialization.

What is the purpose of anthropomorphizing AI technology by naming it "Underlord"? How do you reassure users that giving a human-like title to AI does not mislead about its capabilities?

The purpose of anthropomorphizing AI technology by naming it "Underlord" is to make the technology more relatable and understandable. Giving it a human-like title helps convey its role and functionality in a more intuitive way, suggesting oversight and management capabilities that assist users in navigating complex tasks. The name is meant to embody the tool’s ability to efficiently handle background operations, much like a knowledgeable guide, thereby reducing the complexity users face and enhancing their creative processes.

To reassure users that this anthropomorphism does not mislead about the capabilities of the AI, we emphasize the metaphorical nature of the name. We make it clear that while "Underlord" suggests a certain level of control and oversight, it is fundamentally a tool designed to assist and enhance human efforts, not replace them. We provide detailed documentation and transparent communication about what the AI can and cannot do, ensuring users have a realistic understanding of its functions.

How do you respond to concerns that the name "Underlord" might be considered linguistically incorrect or awkward?

We acknowledge that the name "Underlord" might initially strike some as linguistically unusual or unconventional, especially given its composite nature and the blending of different roots and themes. However, the decision to name our AI editing assistant "Underlord" was made with careful consideration of its impact and significance.

The name is intended to be memorable and impactful, capturing the essence of the AI's capabilities in a single, powerful term. "Underlord" effectively conveys the AI's role in mastering the underlying complexities of video editing, functioning as a foundational force that supports and enhances the user's creative process. This metaphorical use aims to embody the robust and behind-the-scenes nature of the AI’s functionality.

Furthermore, we see linguistic creativity as a positive force in technology branding, helping products stand out and conveying their unique attributes in a crowded market. The innovative use of language reflects the innovative nature of our technology. We engage with our user community and the broader public to explain the thought process behind the name and to demonstrate how it aligns with the product's core functionalities and benefits.

By discussing the intent and symbolism behind the name, we hope to mitigate any perceived linguistic awkwardness and help users appreciate the deeper meanings and connotations that "Underlord" brings to our AI technology.

How does Descript address concerns that the name "Underlord" might evoke associations with dark or malevolent supernatural entities?

Descript takes the concerns regarding the potential associations of the name "Underlord" with dark or malevolent supernatural entities seriously. We understand that names carry significant weight and can evoke a wide range of emotional and cultural responses.

To address these concerns, we emphasize the context and specific meaning behind "Underlord" as it applies to our AI editing assistant. The name is intended to reflect the AI's robust capability to handle and streamline the complex, often unseen layers of video editing processes, acting as a powerful, supportive force beneath the surface of user interaction. It connotes control and mastery over the underlying aspects of video editing, rather than any supernatural or negative connotations.

Additionally, we are proactive in our communications to clarify that the "Underlord" naming choice is rooted in metaphorical and symbolic meanings associated with strength and foundational support in the technological context, distancing it from any supernatural implications. We also provide educational content that explains the functionalities and benefits of the AI, reinforcing its role as a tool designed to empower creativity and efficiency rather than to intimidate or dominate.

How does Descript address the hierarchical implications of the term "lord" in the name "Underlord"?

Descript carefully selected the term "Underlord" for our AI editing assistant to highlight its supportive role, placing it beneath the user in the hierarchy of control. The name is intended to emphasize that, while the AI possesses sophisticated capabilities to manage and simplify complex tasks, it fundamentally serves at the user’s behest. This positioning reinforces that the AI is a tool under the command of the user, who remains firmly in the driver’s seat.

In our communications and interactions with users, we stress that "Underlord" acts as an enabler of creativity and efficiency, designed to support rather than lead. It’s a partnership where the AI takes on the heavy lifting of video editing processes, allowing users to focus on higher-level creative decisions. This collaborative dynamic ensures that users feel empowered and in control, with "Underlord" providing reliable and intelligent assistance from a position that enhances user authority, not diminishes it. By consistently framing "Underlord" in this way, we affirm our commitment to a user-centric approach, where the technology serves the user’s needs and visions, maintaining their autonomy and leadership in all creative endeavors.

How do you respond to claims of interdisciplinary confusion caused by the name "Underlord"?

In responding to claims of interdisciplinary confusion caused by the name "Underlord," Descript acknowledges the importance of clear communication and understanding across various fields. We understand that terms can carry different meanings and connotations in different disciplines, and it is crucial that the name of our AI editing assistant is framed accurately within its intended technological context.

To clarify any confusion, Descript emphasizes the metaphorical use of "Underlord" to represent the AI’s capabilities in managing and facilitating the complex, foundational processes of video editing. We strive to convey that the choice of name is linked directly to its function as an assistant that operates 'underneath' the surface, enhancing user capabilities without taking center stage. This clarification is supported through detailed educational outreach, including comprehensive documentation and communications that explain the rationale behind the name and its relevance to the product's features.

What is your response to individuals who may find the term "lord" in "Underlord" to evoke negative historical or personal associations?

We understand and take seriously the concerns that the term "lord" in "Underlord" might evoke negative historical or personal associations for some individuals. It’s important for us at Descript to communicate that the use of "lord" in the name of our AI editing assistant is intended to metaphorically convey mastery over the complex and foundational aspects of video editing, rather than to resonate with any historical or authoritarian connotations.

We strive to ensure that our product's name is interpreted in the context of technological innovation and support, emphasizing its role in empowering users by simplifying and enhancing the video editing process. We also recognize the sensitivity of language and its impact on diverse audiences. To this end, we are committed to engaging in open dialogues with our community to listen to their experiences and perceptions. This feedback is invaluable and can guide us in evolving our approach to branding and communications to be more inclusive and sensitive to the diverse backgrounds of our users.

Moreover, we provide information about the capabilities and benefits of "Underlord" to help clarify the constructive and supportive nature of the AI, reinforcing that the choice of name is aligned with the positive attributes of help and efficiency. By maintaining clear and compassionate communication, and being open to revisiting our branding strategy based on user feedback, we aim to mitigate any discomfort and ensure that the name enhances user experience and engagement with the product.

How do you address concerns about the potential overuse and dilution of strong terms like "lord" in commercial contexts? What makes "Underlord" a justified use of a potent term in the realm of AI technology?

Addressing concerns about the overuse and potential dilution of strong terms like "lord" in commercial contexts is crucial for maintaining the integrity and impact of our branding. At Descript, we are mindful that the selection of such a potent term for our AI editing assistant carries significant weight and requires careful consideration. The decision to use "Underlord" was not taken lightly; it was chosen because it encapsulates the powerful functionality and deep operational control that the product offers to users managing complex video editing tasks.

The justification for using "Underlord" in the realm of AI technology lies in its ability to convey the assistant's role as a profound, underlying force that enhances the user's creative capabilities. This name reflects the product's design to act almost like a hidden guide, mastering the less visible, foundational aspects of video editing so that users can focus on the creative and visible parts of their projects. "Underlord" suggests a level of expertise and control, qualities that are desirable in technology that handles such intricate processes.

Furthermore, we actively engage with our user base to explain the symbolism behind the name and its relevance to the product's capabilities. By maintaining transparent and open communication, we aim to illustrate how "Underlord" aligns with the innovative and empowering nature of our technology, ensuring that the term enriches the product's identity rather than merely serving as a marketing tactic. This approach helps preserve the term's strength and significance, ensuring it remains impactful and meaningful within the context of our AI technology.

How does the company ensure that using a term linked to mythological "underworld" figures is culturally sensitive?

Descript is committed to cultural sensitivity in all aspects of our branding and product communication, particularly when using terms like "Underlord" which may resonate with mythological or cultural symbols. In choosing this name, we are mindful of its potential connections to mythological "underworld" figures and the diverse interpretations that may arise across different cultures.

To ensure the term is received with the intended respect and understanding, we focus heavily on clarifying its context within the technological domain of our AI editing assistant. Our marketing and customer support materials clearly explain that "Underlord" signifies the AI’s robust backend capabilities, managing the underlying complexities of video editing processes. This helps delineate the term from any mythological connotations, positioning it strictly within a technological framework. Additionally, through our internal guidelines, we maintain a rigorous standard for cultural sensitivity, ensuring that our communications consistently reflect a respectful and inclusive approach. This includes careful review of branding elements to prevent cultural misinterpretations and to honor the diverse backgrounds of our user base.

Given the potentially gender-specific implications of the term "lord," what are the company's views on the feedback that the name "Underlord" might be seen as patriarchal?

Descript understands the concerns regarding the potentially gender-specific implications of using the term "lord" in the name "Underlord." We acknowledge that the term might traditionally carry patriarchal connotations. However, it's important to clarify that in the context of our AI, "Underlord" is intended to signify a supportive and subservient role, not one of dominance. The AI is designed to function as an assistant that is under the control of the user, helping to manage the complex, underlying processes of video editing efficiently.

The term "Underlord" emphasizes the AI's role as an underlying support system, where it aids and enhances the user’s creative capabilities without leading or directing. This highlights that the true power and control lie with the user, positioning the AI as a tool that serves at the user's behest. Descript is committed to fostering an environment where our technology is seen as empowering users of all genders, focusing on functionality and user empowerment. We continuously gather and consider feedback on the name and remain open to evolving our branding to better reflect our values of inclusivity and equality, ensuring that all aspects of our product support a positive and empowering user experience.

How do you respond to gamers who might see the use of "Underlord" as unoriginal or a problematic crossover?

Descript understands the concerns within the gaming community about the use of "Underlord," a term that might also be familiar within gaming circles, possibly raising issues around originality or unwanted crossover. We appreciate the depth of engagement gamers have with their favorite titles, where names and terms carry significant narrative and emotional weight. Our choice of "Underlord" for our AI editing assistant was made with a deep respect for these contexts, aiming to draw on the strengths and positive associations of the term without infringing on or diluting its meaning in gaming.

In responding to gamers and other stakeholders, we emphasize that "Underlord" was selected to highlight the tool’s capacity to adeptly manage the layers of complexity in video editing, operating with expertise behind the scenes, much like a masterful overseer in various narratives. We clarify that the intention is not to overlap with or leverage gaming cultures but to resonate with the universal idea of powerful, supportive technology. Moreover, we are committed to engaging directly with the gaming community to discuss these concerns, offering transparency about our branding process and listening to their perspectives. This engagement is part of our broader commitment to respect all community interpretations and to ensure that our product's identity enriches user experience without causing cultural or contextual conflicts.

How does Descript address concerns that the name "Underlord" could be seen as referencing demonic or evil figures, potentially offending religious users?

Descript takes seriously the concerns that the name "Underlord" might evoke associations with demonic or evil figures, potentially offending religious users. We understand the importance of cultural and religious sensitivity in global branding, especially when dealing with terms that may carry significant symbolic weight.

To address these concerns, Descript focuses on clarifying the context and intent behind the naming choice. We emphasize that "Underlord" was selected to represent the AI’s capabilities in managing the underlying, complex processes of video editing efficiently—not to invoke any supernatural or malevolent connotations. The name is intended to convey a sense of depth and mastery over the foundational elements of creative work, rather than any negative or dark imagery.

What considerations were made regarding the psychological impact of users feeling "under" an authority figure named "Underlord"? How does the company plan to balance the powerful connotations of the name with the need for users to feel in control and at ease with the technology?

Descript carefully considered the psychological implications of naming our AI editing assistant "Underlord," particularly the potential for users to feel subordinate to an authority figure implied by the name. We recognize that the dynamics of user interaction with technology can significantly affect their comfort and engagement levels. To mitigate any negative connotations associated with the term "lord," which could suggest dominance, we focused on framing "Underlord" within the context of support and empowerment rather than control.

To balance the powerful connotations of the name, Descript emphasizes that "Underlord" serves as a tool that users command, rather than one that commands them. The AI is designed to operate as a behind-the-scenes assistant, managing complex tasks to streamline the video editing process and enhance user creativity without imposing. This approach positions "Underlord" as a facilitator that enriches the user experience by providing robust support and allowing greater creative freedom.

Moreover, in our communications and user interface design, we consistently highlight that the user is in charge. The user interface is intuitive, giving clear, manageable options and controls that reinforce the user’s leading role in the creative process. Through user education and transparent feature descriptions, we ensure that users understand how to leverage "Underlord" to their advantage, promoting a sense of empowerment and control. This strategy not only alleviates concerns about the AI's authoritative implications but also enhances the overall user experience by making technology approachable and user-friendly.

How do you justify the use of "Underlord" in professional settings, especially in industries that value trust and reliability?

Justifying the use of "Underlord" in professional settings, particularly in industries where trust and reliability are paramount, involves clear communication about the intended symbolism and functionality of the AI editing assistant. The name "Underlord" was chosen to highlight the AI's robust capability to manage and streamline the complex, underlying processes of video editing, providing a strong foundation upon which professionals can rely to enhance their work efficiency and creativity.

In professional contexts, it is crucial to emphasize that "Underlord" symbolizes the tool’s powerful support system, designed to operate with precision and reliability. It underscores the AI’s role as a dependable entity that enhances productivity and supports decision-making, rather than implying any form of dominance or control over the user. This aligns well with the values of trust and reliability, as "Underlord" assists professionals by reliably handling the intricate aspects of their projects, enabling them to focus on high-level creative and strategic tasks.

Moreover, we ensure that all marketing and instructional materials clearly articulate how "Underlord" integrates into professional workflows, demonstrating its value as a business tool. By showcasing real-world applications and success stories within various industries, we reinforce the practical benefits and reliability of "Underlord." This strategic communication helps professionals understand that "Underlord" is not just a creatively named tool but a sophisticated, reliable technology designed to meet the high standards of their respective fields.

What part of late stage capitalism makes you think that I, as a user, have any appetite for engaging with the concept of servitude when trying to use a SaaS product?

The choice of the name "Underlord" for our AI assistant was intended not to evoke servitude but to challenge and playfully subvert traditional hierarchies in technology-user relationships. The philosopher Michel Foucault discussed the ways in which language and power are intertwined, suggesting that often the subversion of expected norms can serve as a tool for critical reflection. In this spirit, "Underlord" aims to invert typical power dynamics, presenting the AI not as a master but as a resource that serves at the user’s behest—a tool fully under the control of its user.

Furthermore, Friedrich Nietzsche’s idea of "revaluation of all values" invites us to question and redefine meanings. By naming an AI "Underlord," we seek to detach from the traditional connotations of dominance associated with "lordship" and instead propose a new, user-centered interpretation where power dynamics are recognized and redefined.

We also draw from the playful skepticism of the existentialists, like Camus, who believed in embracing the absurdity of life. In a world where AI names often lean towards the overly friendly or mundane, "Underlord" is an attempt to infuse a bit of philosophical humor into our daily interactions with technology, reminding us that while AI is a sophisticated tool, it is ultimately our creation, our assistant, and not our master.

We understand and appreciate that interpretations vary, and what might be humorous or thought-provoking to some may not resonate in the same way with others. We are grateful for feedback like yours as it helps us reflect on our choices and strive to better align our communication with the diverse values of our community.

Was this page helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful